The Arctic War is a war without battlefields. The heads of state never follow the policy of war. An Arctic war is not a physical war, but a challenge to find possible solutions in consultation with other leaders inside or outside the country before the war. In other words, an Arctic war is nothing more than a cold war in which “Cold War” means that kind of silent war in which a subjective fact influences a country towards war through prolonged discussion against possible forces of evil. As the war withdraws, heads of state become fearful of making a decision about the crisis in order to show the competence and strength of other nations in the state. When governing a country, one becomes a victim of the economic crisis, administrative blockages and lack of financial problems, the head of states absorbed in deep reflection to find a solution to determine the problem. In this hypercritical state of affairs of a nation, a cold war prevails over time.
Referring to the missile crisis, John F Kennedy has faced a severe problem and, by not being contentious, he was succeeding in retaliating and saving his compatriots from the heavy casualties of war with modern weapons and missiles. In this context, he delivered an astonishing speech that has been replicated as the hopes and aspirations of the American people in their real-life situation. He said that, for many years, both the Soviet Union and the United States, distinguishing the so-called reality, have well thought out strategic nuclear weapons with great care, never perplexing the unstable sculpture that ensured that these weapons would not be used in deficiency. of some imperative to confront. Its own strategic missiles have never been moved into the territory of any other nation under the guise of concealment and deception; And in American history, unlike that of the Soviets since the final stages of World War II, it shows that the American people have no interest in managing or achieving achievements over any other nation or imposing their system on their village. However, American citizens have become accustomed to living daily on the target of Soviet missiles placed inside the USSR or on submarines.
In view of the above, it is evident that missiles in Cuba add to a previously clear and present danger, although it must be taken into account that Latin American nations have never before been subject to a possible nuclear threat. But this stealthy, rapid, and remarkable build-up of communist missiles, in an area well known for having a historic and unusual relationship with the United States and the nations of the Western Hemisphere, in violation of Soviet guarantees and in defiance of American and hemispheric laws. . Politics, this sudden and stealthy decision to place premeditated weapons for the first time off Soviet soil, is a deliberately thought-provoking and uncomfortable shift in the statuesque that cannot be accepted by this country, if bravery and skill can ever be relied upon. commitment of the American people. again for friend or foe.
